What is DFIR?
Digital forensics and incident response (DFIR) refers to an extended process of investigating, remediating, documenting, reporting, and analyzing the causes and effects of a cyber incident. As the name suggests, it is a combination of two interdependent areas of expertise, and it may be the responsibility of a single team or a combination of stakeholders.
Digital forensics involves the discovery, collection, preservation, and analysis of all relevant evidence of a cyber crime. The areas of search may include devices, network traffic and logs, hard drives, memory cards, or cloud environments: basically anything that might yield evidence of how criminals or malicious insiders accessed a company's digital environment and what they did afterwards.
Incident response refers to the task of preparing for a breach, responding immediately to an intrusion once detected, containing damage and confirming that bad actors no longer have access, restoring affected systems, and repairing any weaknesses exploited by the attackers.
The Importance of DFIR
DFIR is an important discipline that requires advanced tools and expertise. The evidence that's pulled together through DFIR may be required in legal, insurance, or regulatory investigations following a security breach or cyber attack. Increasingly it requires specialized teams or security operations centers (SOCs) that can employ sophisticated tools, such as network detection and response (NDR) or extended detection and response (XDR). Historically considered to be a reactive process, DFIR is now considered an essential part of an overall cybersecurity preparation strategy.
Rapid, efficient, and thorough response to a cyber breach is essential, but it is only one step in the larger process that is DFIR, which must be methodical as well as forward-thinking.
DFIR also helps the organization in these areas:
Criminal Investigation. The evidence collected through digital forensics and incident response can provide the basis for law enforcement action against criminals whose actions result in data theft, identity theft, or financial losses. DFIR analysis of preserved electronic data can uncover evidence that can aid in apprehending or prosecuting bad actors.
Regulations and Compliance. Companies in many industries are subject to regulations around their use and protection of data and the security controls they deploy. DFIR can help demonstrate that a company was in compliance despite a breach, or show they are applying due diligence to their remediation efforts.
Protection of Intellectual Property. Digital forensics and incident response can establish exactly what data was compromised in a breach, or make the case for better digital protection of a company's most valuable intellectual property assets.
Understanding the Incident. Security teams use the DFIR process to piece together details of a breach: the attackers' identity; how they accessed the organization's digital infrastructure; how they moved through the infrastructure; what systems they accessed; what data was exfiltrated or destroyed; confirming that the attackers are no longer present in company systems; and what steps can be taken to prevent their return.
According to this definition, the term response in Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) encompasses not only the immediate actions taken following a cyber breach but also extends beyond that. Ideally, the response should incorporate strategies aimed at enhancing the organization's digital securities, derived from a thorough forensic analysis. Thus, DIFR is not limited to addressing the direct cause of a breach; it also identifies additional vulnerabilities and suggests measures for risk mitigation, ultimately aiming to avert future cyberattacks.
Steps in DFIR
Digital forensics and incident response activities can be categorized into two distinct workflows; however, security teams frequently conduct them simultaneously. For the purposes of this discussion, we have integrated the tasks of digital forensics (DF) and incident response (IR) into a unified framework:
Forensic Collection. The process of collecting forensic evidence is inherently scientific, facilitating the investigation and possible prosecution of criminal activities. In the realm of cybersecurity, forensics also plays a crucial role in analysis and remediation efforts. The evidence gathered can provide investigators with insights into the events that transpired and inform strategies to enhance security measures. This process generally encompasses the examination of:
File systems and memory from any affected endpoints;
Network forensics, which may involve packet capture (PCAP), traffic analysis, web browsing behavior, and other network activities that could illuminate the pathways taken by attackers to infiltrate systems.
The analysis of logs produced by operating systems, applications, network devices, and other system components to identify signs of unusual behavior or actions.
The subsequent steps in Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) hinge on the meticulous collection of forensic evidence. In the absence of this evidence, security teams may lack the assurance needed to accurately assess the incident and effectively respond to and remediate the impacted systems.
Triage and investigation. The evidence gathered allows security teams to focus on the specific threat and implement measures to mitigate it, all while ensuring that forensic documentation is maintained. Alerts generated by intrusion detection systems, along with insights from network analysis, can significantly decrease the mean time to respond (MTTR) to an attack.
Notification and reporting. After the response team has confirmed that the attack is under control, it is essential to document all damages. This includes compiling a list of affected assets, detailing the types of data that were compromised, exfiltrated, or destroyed, and outlining the actions taken to neutralize the threat. The team must then prepare comprehensive reports for company leadership, law enforcement, insurers, regulators, or any other entities requiring a detailed and accurate account of the incident.
Incident follow-up. The security team should evaluate the collected evidence with a focus on improvement and fortification. What aspects of the triage and evidence collection were effective? How swiftly did the team respond and mitigate the damage? How does this incident inform the overall robustness of the organization's security posture? Was the security team able to develop a thorough understanding of the organization's networks, systems, and endpoints? What strategies can be implemented to avert similar incidents or other forms of cyber attacks in the future?
Challenges of DFIR
A significant challenge in the digital forensics and incident response (DFIR) process arises from the presence of fragmented and disconnected evidence. As organizations' digital ecosystems grow increasingly intricate, essential forensic data may be scattered across various unlinked locations. The task of consolidating all pertinent evidence from both virtual and physical environments can be labor-intensive and complex.
This issue is further intensified by the expanding attack surfaces of organizations, which not only increase the number of potential vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit but also complicate and prolong the evidence-gathering process. Additionally, the continuous emergence of new tools, applications, and updates to operating systems necessitates that security and forensic teams consistently update their expertise—a challenge that is made more difficult by the shortage of adequately trained cybersecurity professionals.
The SOC Visibility Triad Facilitates Comprehensive Forensics Collection
In light of the intricate nature of digital systems and the necessity for swift responses to security breaches, effective forensics collection relies on methodologies that incorporate a wide array of data sources. A thorough forensics collection process requires tools and systems that offer rapid and in-depth visibility across the entire environment.
Introduced by Gartner in 2019, the SOC Visibility Triad serves as a framework aimed at enhancing the transparency of endpoints, networks, and logs, thereby empowering security teams to adopt a more proactive stance. This framework integrates endpoint detection and response (EDR), network detection and response (NDR), and security information and event management (SIEM). Collectively, these three capabilities can gather real-time data from various sources, creating a synergistic effect that amplifies the efficacy of each technology.
Digital forensics and incident response (DFIR) teams can gain significant advantages by selecting solutions that prioritize an evidence-based approach to forensics and incident management. The importance of evidence is particularly pronounced in network monitoring, where the increasing volume of traffic complicates threat detection and response efforts annually. As cyberattacks grow more sophisticated, having detailed evidence becomes essential for differentiating between normal user activities and an attacker’s lateral movements within a network.
Developing effective network forensics and DFIR strategies hinges on an evidence-based security approach. This encompasses not only the collection of evidence post-incident but also the deployment of tools and strategies that enhance the precision and effectiveness of threat hunting prior to a breach. Open-source platforms like Zeek can convert network traffic into concise activity logs, thereby streamlining the triage and collection processes for forensics teams.
Sophisticated NDR solutions that utilize adaptable metadata from both network and cloud environments address a critical aspect that DFIR response teams must analyze for breach evidence. When integrated with EDR and SIEM (or XDR), NDR can deliver a comprehensive overview essential for DFIR analysts to effectively manage a breach, generate precise reports, and implement proactive measures to mitigate future cyber risks.
Rate This Article
Thanks for reading: Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR), Sorry, my English is bad:)